[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0)
    On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 07:50:39PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
    > Yes, IPv6 needs "split device" semantics
    > (for per-device statistics such as Ip6InDelivers etc),
    > and I like later solution.

    OK. Is there any reason why IPv4 should be different from IPv6 in
    this respect though?

    If the split device dst's are to be kept, we'll need a way to clean
    them up. There are two choices:

    1) Put the dst's on IPv6's own GC so that we can search by rt6i_idev.
    2) Change the generic GC so that dst->ops->ifdown is always called even
    if dst->dev does not match with the device going down. We also need to
    change the individual ifdown functions to check for ->dev. The IPv6
    ifdown function can then check for ->rt6i_idev as well.

    What's your preference?

    Visit Openswan at
    Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
    Home Page:
    PGP Key:
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.029 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site