[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [2.6 patch] add compiler-gcc4.h
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 10:45:52AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> >As I already said in this thread:
> > The currently used file for gcc 4 is compiler-gcc+.h, not
> > compiler-gcc3.h .
> >
> >And the current setup is to have one file for every major number of gcc.
> >I have no strong opinion whether this approach or the approach of one
> >file for all gcc versions is better - but with the current approach,
> >everything else than a separate file for gcc 4 wasn't logical.
> Yes it is. It's perfectly logical: gcc+ contains the "going forward"
> version, and until it supports some feature that isn't in all versions
> of gcc4, it's the right thing to do.

It doesn't seem to be logical for everyone whether compiler-gcc+.h or
compiler-gcc3.h is used for gcc 4.0 ...

Perhaps compiler-gcc+.h (which wasn't always updated when
compiler-gcc3.h was updated) should be removed?

> -hpa



"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.071 / U:11.028 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site