lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Dynamic tick, version 050127-1
    On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Tony Lindgren wrote:

    > * Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk> [050204 09:31]:
    > > On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Tony Lindgren wrote:
    > >
    > > > Yes, it's safer to keep the timer periodic, although it's
    > > > used for oneshot purposes for the skips. If the timer interrupt
    > > > got missed for some reason, the system would be able to recover when
    > > > it's in periodic mode.
    > > >
    > > > And with some timers, we can do the reprogramming faster, as we just
    > > > need to load the new value.
    > > >
    > > > I could not figure out how to disable the interrupts for PIT
    > > > when local APIC is used and the ticks to skip is longer than PIT
    > > > would allow. So I just changed the mode temporarily to disable it.
    > > >
    > > > Does anybody know if there's a way to stop PIT interrupts while
    > > > keeping it in the periodic mode?
    > >
    > > disable_irq(0) ?
    >
    > Then the problem is that the CPU does not stay in sleep but wakes to
    > the first PIT interrupt AFAIK.

    I do not understand, do you want to disable the PIT from interrupting the
    processor and enable it interrupting at a later time?
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.028 / U:0.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site