Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:59:22 +0900 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2 29/29] ide: make data_phase explicit in NO_DATA cases |
| |
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:12:38 +0900, Tejun Heo <tj@home-tj.org> wrote: > >>>29_ide_explicit_TASKFILE_NO_DATA.patch >>> >>> Make data_phase explicit in NO_DATA cases. >> >>Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@home-tj.org> >> >>Index: linux-ide-export/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c >>=================================================================== >>--- linux-ide-export.orig/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2005-02-02 10:28:07.852771465 +0900 >>+++ linux-ide-export/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2005-02-02 10:28:08.121727827 +0900 >>@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static unsigned long idedisk_read_native >> args.tfRegister[IDE_SELECT_OFFSET] = 0x40; >> args.tfRegister[IDE_COMMAND_OFFSET] = WIN_READ_NATIVE_MAX; >> args.command_type = IDE_DRIVE_TASK_NO_DATA; >>+ args.data_phase = TASKFILE_NO_DATA; >> args.handler = &task_no_data_intr; > > > Could you add small helper to ide.h for doing this? > > static inline void ide_prep_no_data_cmd(ide_task_t *task) > { > task->command_type = IDE_DRIVE_TASK_NO_DATA; > task->data_phase = TASKFILE_NO_DATA; > task->handler = &task_no_data_intr; > }
I am thinking about removing task->handler initialization. Such that it defaults to task_no_data_intr if data_phase == TASKFILE_NO_DATA and so on for all other data_phases. Currently, the same information is specified repeatedly. What do you think?
> Also please move this patch earlier in the series > so I can merge it quickly. > > Thanks.
Sure.
-- tejun
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |