lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: sched_yield behavior
    Giovanni Tusa wrote:

    > If I am not wrong, the scheduler will choose it again (it will be still the
    > higher priority task, and the only of its priority list).
    > I have to add an explicit sleep to effectively relinquish the CPU for some
    > time, or the scheduler can deal with such a
    > situation in another way?

    Yes, the scheduler will choose it again. This behaviour is also
    specified in the relevant standards.

    Your alternatives may be to use other methods of userspace
    synchronisation (eg. pipes, semaphores), or to use timers.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.021 / U:0.888 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site