lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 12/13] schedstats additions for sched-balance-fork

    * Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

    > [PATCH 11/13] sched-domains aware balance-on-fork
    > [PATCH 12/13] schedstats additions for sched-balance-fork
    > [PATCH 13/13] basic tuning

    STREAMS numbers tricky. It's pretty much the only benchmark that 1)
    relies on being able to allocate alot of RAM in a NUMA-friendly way 2)
    does all of its memory allocation in the first timeslice of cloned
    worker threads.

    There is little help we get from userspace, and i'm not sure we want to
    add scheduler overhead for this single benchmark - when something like a
    _tiny_ bit of NUMAlib use within the OpenMP library would probably solve
    things equally well!

    Anyway, the code itself looks fine and it would be good if it improved
    things, so:

    Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

    but this too needs alot of testing, and it the one that has the highest
    likelyhood of actually not making it upstream.

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.022 / U:0.696 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site