lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] pdirops: vfs patch
Quoting Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>:

> >>>>> Jan Blunck (JB) writes:
>
> JB> i_sem does NOT protect the dcache. Also not in real_lookup(). The lock
> must be
> JB> acquired for ->lookup() and because we might sleep on i_sem, we have to
> get it
> JB> early and check for repopulation of the dcache.
>
> dentry is part of dcache, right? i_sem protects dentry from being
> returned with incomplete data inside, right?
>

Nope, d_alloc() is setting d_flags to DCACHE_UNHASHED. Therefore it is not found
by __d_lookup() until it is rehashed which is implicit done by ->lookup().

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans