Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:40:22 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] page table iterators |
| |
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote: > > My opinion FWIW: I'm all for regularizing the pagetable loops to > work the same way, changing their variables to use the same names, > improving their efficiency; but I do like to see what a loop is up to. > > list_for_each and friends are very widely used, they're fine, and I'm > quite glad to have their prefetching hidden away from me; but usually > I groan, grin and bear it, each time someone devises a clever new > for_each macro concealing half the details of some specialist loop. > > In a minority?
Of two.
Let's see what they look like. They'd need to be very good, IMO. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |