[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BK] upgrade will be needed
"Theodore Ts'o" <> writes:
> The "cost" of using BK seems to be primarily more theoretical, and
> ideological, than real.

I've never used BK (not allowed to), but some things I've read about it
sound quite annoying. For instance:

* Every source tree contains your entire repository => massive disk usage

* Must "unlock" files before working on them ("bk edit"); I recall
doing this with RCS, and it was, well, a real pain.

"Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
you do it." Mahatma Ghandi
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.186 / U:23.900 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site