[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [BK] upgrade will be needed
    On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > >> if they really need the more powerful features. Or we could donate
    > > >> some on a case by case basis.
    > > >>
    > > >> If the hackers who are using BK can reach agreement that it would be
    > > >> better if the BK they had didn't move forward unless they got commercial
    > > >> seats then we could start moving towards a license on the free product
    > > >> that was less restrictive. What that would mean is that the BK you have
    > >
    > > > I want to pay the fee for Linus and Alan.
    > >
    > > I'd like to pay the fee to have Linus' license to use BK revoked. But
    > > I probably can't afford it, oh well :-)
    > Easy, start working for OSDL, then start hacking arch or
    > whatever. Puff, you are his coworker, you are competing with Larry,
    > Linus license goes away.

    I don't know whether the kernel hackers that work for IBM use the `free'
    version of BK or not, but if they do, s/OSDL/IBM/ and s/arch/ClearCase/ and
    there's a problem...



    Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

    In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
    when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
    -- Linus Torvalds
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.019 / U:44.684 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site