[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BK] upgrade will be needed
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >> if they really need the more powerful features. Or we could donate
> > >> some on a case by case basis.
> > >>
> > >> If the hackers who are using BK can reach agreement that it would be
> > >> better if the BK they had didn't move forward unless they got commercial
> > >> seats then we could start moving towards a license on the free product
> > >> that was less restrictive. What that would mean is that the BK you have
> >
> > > I want to pay the fee for Linus and Alan.
> >
> > I'd like to pay the fee to have Linus' license to use BK revoked. But
> > I probably can't afford it, oh well :-)
> Easy, start working for OSDL, then start hacking arch or
> whatever. Puff, you are his coworker, you are competing with Larry,
> Linus license goes away.

I don't know whether the kernel hackers that work for IBM use the `free'
version of BK or not, but if they do, s/OSDL/IBM/ and s/arch/ClearCase/ and
there's a problem...



Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.121 / U:1.308 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site