[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [BK] upgrade will be needed
    Hash: SHA1

    On 02/17/2005 04:55 PM, Roland Kuhn wrote:

    > That said, it would of course be possible to improve the internal
    > workflow of our emperor penguin if he used subversion, but the
    > collaboration with others could not benefit the way it does with a
    > changeset-based approach.

    Question is then, what about keeping a main trunk with the vanialle
    release, and each dev has its own branch. now at a certain point you
    have to merge them. Now where is the difference between a central rep
    and a de-central one.
    At day X, patches from Andrew's tree have to go to Linus tree and from
    his tree into the new vanialla kernel. right?
    Somehow I can't see the difference here.

    > Linux kernel development is hard _and_ sexy :-)

    at least something :D

    - --
    [ Clemens Schwaighofer -----=====:::::~ ]
    [ TBWA\ && TEQUILA\ Japan IT Group ]
    [ 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0061, JAPAN ]
    [ Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703 Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343 ]
    [ ]
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
    Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -

    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.020 / U:42.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site