lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [BK] upgrade will be needed
From
Date
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 18:32 -0500, Sean wrote:
> On Thu, February 17, 2005 6:25 pm, Ed Tomlinson said:
> > Linus has tried other SCMs. They did not suffice. I remember the preBK
> > days, when you had to post a patch half a dozen time to get it merged.
> > Patches were being missed left right and center. This changed after BK.
> > We _are_ getting large benefits from BK. They may be hard to see at our
> > side of the keyboard - but I believe Linus when he says BK is the best
> > tool for him. That this probably will not be the case for ever. Think
> > it still is for now though.
>
> It's not a choice between BK or nothing. Much of the improvements you're
> attributing to BK would have been realized with any other SCM system too.
>

Ed did not say it was a choice between BK and nothing. He said "Linus
has tried other SCMs. They did not suffice." Did you even read his
comment?

Please don't cc: me on this thread anymore, unless it's about some work
you did to bring BK functionality to a free SCM.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.139 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site