[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] page table iterators
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 00:03 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:

> And to be honest we only have about 6 or 7 of these walkers
> in the whole kernel. And 90% of them are in memory.c
> While doing 4level I think I changed all of them around several
> times and it wasn't that big an issue. So it's not that we
> have a big pressing problem here...

We have about 50% of them in memory.c :) But my main problem is more
that every single of them is implemented slightly differently.

Going Nick's way is a good start. If they are all consolidated to use
the same macro, they will be easier for you to change later on anyway.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.070 / U:1.324 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site