[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] page table iterators
    On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 00:03 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:

    > And to be honest we only have about 6 or 7 of these walkers
    > in the whole kernel. And 90% of them are in memory.c
    > While doing 4level I think I changed all of them around several
    > times and it wasn't that big an issue. So it's not that we
    > have a big pressing problem here...

    We have about 50% of them in memory.c :) But my main problem is more
    that every single of them is implemented slightly differently.

    Going Nick's way is a good start. If they are all consolidated to use
    the same macro, they will be easier for you to change later on anyway.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.018 / U:3.152 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site