Messages in this thread | | | From | YhLu <> | Subject | RE: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken | Date | Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:37:08 -0800 |
| |
Yes. should not use prink(ERR....
YH
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@muc.de] > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 10:22 PM > To: YhLu > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:30:51PM -0800, YhLu wrote: > > forget about it. I found the reason: I only put node 0 has > RAM installed. > > There is some problem with this code - it complains on a few machines. > However it's relatively harmless when this happens, so I > haven't looked it yet. Should perhaps take out the printk. > > -Andi > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |