[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.11-rc3-mm2
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 22:41 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> [ the best solution is .... ]
> [ my preferred solution is ... ]
> [ it would be better if ... ]
> [ this is a kludge and it should be done instead like ... ]
> did nobody read what andrew wrote and what JOQ pointed out?
> after weeks of debating this, no other conceptual solution emerged
> that did not have at least as many problems as the RT LSM module, and
> all other proposed solutions were also more invasive of other aspects
> of kernel design and operations than RT LSM is.

Sure, it is quick and easy. Suits some. At least I do prefer
this to altering the semantics of realtime scheduling.

I can't say much about it because I'm not putting my hand up to
do anything. Just mentioning that rlimit would be better if not
for the userspace side of the equation. I think most were already
agreed on that point anyway though.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.051 / U:22.004 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site