Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:41:59 +0100 | From | "Jan Beulich" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.15-rc5-mm1 (x86_64-hpet-overflow.patch breaks resume from disk) |
| |
>>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> 09.12.05 12:20:05 >>> >On Friday, 9 December 2005 10:15, Jan Beulich wrote: >> It's a possible way to address this, but I'd rather just set a flag >> indicating that the last-whatever values should not be considered (to >> get into a state just like after initial boot). Jan > >OK, but what is the interrupt handler supposed to do if the >vxtime.last* values are invalid? I guess assume delta = 0?
As I said, the state should be (re)set to whatever is in effect at boot.
>BTW, in the interrupt handler there is: > > __asm__("mulq %1\n\t" > "shrdq $32, %%rdx, %0" > : "+a" (delta) > : "rm" (vxtime.tsc_quot) > : "rdx"); > >Is the "+a" a typo?
Why would you think so?
Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |