lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:41:52PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>
>>Do you even know if this special case is applicable outside of Dell ICH5
>>boxes? And I thought your previous messages were referring to ICH6?
>
>
> Every laptop I have access to, whether it's SATA or PATA, fires an ACPI
> notification when a drive is removed from a bay. The ICH5 case is
> probably somewhat special-cased, but when we move over to driving PATA
> with libata it's going to be a lot more useful. If ICH6 can be managed
> without resorting to ACPI, it's less necessary in the short term, but I
> think PATA support is going to require it in the end anyway (especially
> since we probably want to call the _GTM and _STM methods on PATA
> devices)

Yes, I do agree with this WRT PATA. Randy Dunlap's ACPI stuff is
particularly interesting for this, though I haven't had time to review
it in depth.

I'm a bit more reluctant WRT SATA.

Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-10 04:00    [W:0.360 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site