lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm 1/5] New system call, unshare

    * JANAK DESAI <janak@us.ibm.com> wrote:

    > To answer Ingo's question, we did look at other flags when I started.
    > However, I wanted to keep the system call simple enough, with atleast
    > namespace unsharing, so it would get accepted. In the original
    > discussion on fsdevel, unsharing of vm was mentioned as useful so I
    > added that in addition to namespace unsharing.

    i think the only sane way to do this is to support unsharing for all
    flags. Internally (i.e. in the patch-queue) it can still be structured
    in a finegrained way, but in terms of exposing it to applications, it
    should be an all or nothing solution i think.

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-09 20:05    [W:0.021 / U:153.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site