lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm 1/5] New system call, unshare

* JANAK DESAI <janak@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> To answer Ingo's question, we did look at other flags when I started.
> However, I wanted to keep the system call simple enough, with atleast
> namespace unsharing, so it would get accepted. In the original
> discussion on fsdevel, unsharing of vm was mentioned as useful so I
> added that in addition to namespace unsharing.

i think the only sane way to do this is to support unsharing for all
flags. Internally (i.e. in the patch-queue) it can still be structured
in a finegrained way, but in terms of exposing it to applications, it
should be an all or nothing solution i think.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-09 20:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans