Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:05:05 +0000 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Minor change to platform_device_register_simple prototype |
| |
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:39:36AM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > Btw, what is the policy on placing EXPORT_SYMBOL(...). Should they all > > go together (at the top or teh bottom) or after each symbol > > definition? Right now platform.c mixes 2 styles... > > Not all grouped together (option 1 above), but > yes, after each symbol definition (option 2 above)... > is the current preference AFAIK.
And of course I didn't want to add extra noise by shuffling them around needlessly, especially if we're going to be removing some of them at some point in the future.
-- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |