lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 00/21] hrtimer - High-resolution timer subsystem

* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:

> > > (It's also interesting how you do that without giving me any
> > > credit for it.)
> >
> > Sorry if it was previously your idea and if we didnt credit you for
> > it.
> > [...]
> >
> > > A bit later ktime_t looked pretty much like the 64bit part of my
> > > ktimespec.
> >
> > and Thomas credited you for that point in his announcement:
> >
> > " Roman pointed out that the penalty for some architectures
> > would be quite big when using the nsec_t (64bit) scalar time
> > storage format. "
>
> "pointed out that the penalty" is a bit different from "provided the
> basic idea of the ktime_t union and half the implementation"...

so ... did you change your position from accusing us of not giving you
_any_ credit:

"It's also interesting how you do that without giving me
any credit for it."

to accusing us of not giving you _enough_ credit? Did i get that right?

And ontop of that, you now want the credit for providing the basic idea
for half of the ktimer/hrtimer implementation? Sorry that i did not find
out in advance that you wanted _that_ ;-)

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-07 18:59    [W:1.082 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site