[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
    Greg KH <> writes:

    > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:56:06PM -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
    > > DISCLAIMER: I'm not speaking for Sony here. Personally
    > > I don't believe that most drivers are derivative works
    > > of the operating systems they run with, and I don't
    > > believe it helps Linux to assert that they are.
    > > But, hey, it's not my kernel, and not my plan for
    > > world domination. ;-)
    > Why do people bring up the "derivative works" issue all the time. Are
    > they so blind to the very simple "linking" issue that all kernel modules
    > do when they are loaded into the kernel?

    Most likely people bring up the "derivative works" issue because
    that's what the GPL says it affects. The FSF contends that linking
    creates a derivative work, but is curiously quiet when people ask for
    statutory or case law to support that claim.

    Besides, if the act of linking is what makes the derivative work,
    there is no problem: The GPL allows a user to make any modifications
    or combinations or derivatives whatsoever, and only imposes
    requirements when the result is distributed. The linking of the two
    works occurs only on the end user's machine.

    Michael Poole
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-06 05:21    [W:0.020 / U:2.996 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site