Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Mon, 05 Dec 2005 22:24:38 +0100 |
| |
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 21:19 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:26 +0000, Andrew Walrond wrote: > > > On December 6th, 2005 the kernel developers en mass decide that binary > > > modules are legally fine and also essential for the progress of linux, > > > > Has anyone (influential) actually being toying with this idea? I hope not, but > > if they are, I'd like to know who to lobby... > > http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e3c3374fbf7efe9487edc53cd10436ed641983aa
I think you're wrong on this. Not about thinking it should be reverted per se, but in the big picture it's not linked to the scenario. One export more or less doesn't matter at all.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |