[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
    > nt model (or at least they have no resources to 
    > do testing [Torvalds])
    > c) end-users (or those who are not kernel maintainers) are directed
    > permanently to distros kernels and "stay away from you
    > wanna-bees!

    this is not what is being said. What is being said is that if you can't
    deal with occasional breakage, you're better off using vendor kernels.
    But.. if you can't deal with occasional breakage, you wouldn't test test
    kernels EITHER. If you can deal with an occasional breakage, I hope you
    and everyone else who can, will run and test kernels,
    especially the -rc ones.

    Most of the "instability" people complain about with the new 2.6 model
    is caused by people not testing the -rc kernels before they are
    released, so that they end up being released with regressions. But...
    that will happen no matter what model you use actually. Before july
    there was a problem where -rc kernels kept changing bigtime, so it was
    hard to know which one to test if you only had time to test one, but
    that is now changed...

    Maybe it's a bit extremist, but I'd like to even state it like this:
    "If you can't be bothered to test -rc kernels, you have no right to
    complain about the final ones", sort of as analogy to the "if you don't
    go voting you have no right to complain about the politicians".

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-04 14:07    [W:0.019 / U:5.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site