[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: fix cpufreq-ondemand by accounting skipped ticks as idle ticks [Was: [PATCH] i386 no idle HZ aka Dynticks 051203]
    On Sunday 04 December 2005 23:24, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
    > Account ticks skipped dynamically as idle ticks.
    > This allows the ondemand cpufreq governor to work correctly with dyntick.

    I never got around to studying it well enough to figure out how to fix it.
    Thanks very much!

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-04 13:35    [W:0.020 / U:5.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site