[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/14] page-replace-single-batch-insert.patch
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 09:44:07AM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Unification of active and inactive per cpu page lists is a requirement
> > for CLOCK-Pro, right?
> You can approximate the functionality through use of scan
> rates. Not quite as accurate as a unified clock, though.

Rik, I dont understand what you mean.

My point is that the page-replacement-policy abstraction patches affect
the original behaviour, and they shouldnt. See the post from Peter about
abstracting the per-cpu lists.

We're talking about different things.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-01 04:01    [W:0.063 / U:9.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site