lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.6 patch] fs/qnx4/bitmap.c: #if 0 qnx4_new_block()
On 12/3/05, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> qnx4_new_block() is neither implemented nor used.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
>
> --- linux-2.6.15-rc3-mm1/fs/qnx4/bitmap.c.old 2005-12-03 11:32:46.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.15-rc3-mm1/fs/qnx4/bitmap.c 2005-12-03 11:33:07.000000000 +0100
> @@ -23,10 +23,12 @@
> #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
>
> +#if 0
> int qnx4_new_block(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif /* 0 */
>
> static void count_bits(register const char *bmPart, register int size,
> int *const tf)
>

Adrian,
You submit a lot of nice patches, but your "#if 0" patches have always
puzzled me. Why is it that you prefer to use #if 0 to remove code
rather than simply delete it?

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-03 13:30    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean