[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 00/2] improve .text size on gcc 4.0 and newer compilers
    Arjan van de Ven <> wrote:
    > > IOW: I'd prefer that we be the ones who specify which functions are going
    > > to be inlined and which ones are not.

    > a bold statement... especially since the "and which ones are not" isn't
    > currently there, we still leave gcc a lot of freedom there ... but only
    > in one direction.

    Besides, this is currently an everywhere or nowhere switch. gcc (in
    principle at least) could decide which calls to inline and for which ones
    it isn't worth it. Just like the (also long to die) "register" keyword.
    Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616
    Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
    Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
    Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-29 16:04    [W:0.020 / U:33.484 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site