Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] updates XFS mutex patch | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:03:42 +0100 |
| |
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 05:59 -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> + > +#define xfs_mutex_init(lock, type, name) mutex_init(lock) > +#define xfs_mutex_lock(lock, type) mutex_lock(lock) > +#define mutex_destroy(lock) do{}while(0)
why not just change all mutex_init users to only pass lock? (same for the others) eg why add another abstraction instead of fixing the caller?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |