lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] updates XFS mutex patch
From
Date
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 05:59 -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:

> +
> +#define xfs_mutex_init(lock, type, name) mutex_init(lock)
> +#define xfs_mutex_lock(lock, type) mutex_lock(lock)
> +#define mutex_destroy(lock) do{}while(0)

why not just change all mutex_init users to only pass lock? (same for
the others) eg why add another abstraction instead of fixing the caller?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-29 12:06    [W:1.206 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site