[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: userspace breakage

    On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
    > >
    > > Now, I'm not saying that we can always support everything that goes on in
    > > user space forever, but dammit, we can try damn hard.
    > Was it a mistake to drop support for ipfwadm and ipchains?
    > Was it a mistake to drop support for devsfs?
    > Will it be a mistake to drop support for gcc < 3.2?

    Those things at least were brewing for _years_. People had lots of
    heads-up warning.

    > Will it be a mistake to remove the obsolete raw driver?
    > Will it be a mistake to drop the Video4Linux API 1 ioctls?
    > Will it be a mistake to drop support for pcmcia-cs?

    And again, this is something that we've been warnign about. We have.

    I'm not talking about never obsoleting bad interfaces at all. I'm talking
    about the unnecessary breakage that comes from changes that simply aren't
    needed, and that isn't given proper heads-up for.

    We used to have a fairly clear point where we could break things, when we
    had major kernel releases (ie 2.4 -> 2.6 broke the module loader. It was
    documented, and it was unavoidable).

    > The fundamental problem is that the current development model
    > contains no well-defined points where breakages of the kernel-related
    > userspace were allowed and expected by users.

    The basic rule should be "never". For example, we now have three different
    generations of the "stat()" system call, and yes, we wrote the code to
    maintain all three interfaces. Breaking an old one for a new better one
    simply wasn't an option.

    Now, the more specialized the usage is, the less strict the "never"
    becomes. But if something becomes a pain for distribution managers (and
    from Dave, it sounds like we've hit that way too often), that definitely
    means that we've broken too many things.

    In short: I don't think anybody can complain about devfs-like things.
    We've kept it up for a _long_ time, and there was tons of help for the
    migration. But clearly DaveJ is unhappy, and that implies that we're not
    doing as well as we should.

    (Which is not to say that we should necessarily bend over backwards to
    make sure that DaveJ is _never_ unhappy. We should just try harder).

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.024 / U:7.508 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site