lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [PATCH v2:3/3]Export cpu topology by sysfs
Date
From
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
>>Sent: 2005年12月24日 3:16
>>To: Zhang, Yanmin
>>Cc: Yanmin Zhang; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; discuss@x86-64.org; linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org; Siddha, Suresh B; Shah, Rajesh;
>>Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH v2:3/3]Export cpu topology by sysfs
>>
>>On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:03:27PM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>>> >>Can't you just use an attribute group and attach it to the cpu kobject?
>>> >>That would save an array of kobjects I think.
>>> As you know, current i386/x86_64 arch also export cache info under
>>> /sys/device/system/cpu/cpuX/cache. Is it clearer to export topology
>>> under a new directory than under cpu directly?
>>
>>No, the place in the sysfs tree you are putting this is just fine. I'm
>>just saying that you do not need to create a new kobject for these
>>attributes. Just use an attribute group, and you will get the same
>>naming, without the need for an extra kobject (and the whole array of
>>kobjects) at all.
>>
>>Does that make more sense?
Yes, indeed. Now, I used your idea and the patch became simpler. Thanks.


>>
>>> >>> +static int __cpuinit topology_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
>>> >>> + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
>>> >>> +{
>>> >>> + unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
>>> >>> + struct sys_device *sys_dev;
>>> >>> +
>>> >>> + sys_dev = get_cpu_sysdev(cpu);
>>> >>> + switch (action) {
>>> >>> + case CPU_ONLINE:
>>> >>> + topology_add_dev(sys_dev);
>>> >>> + break;
>>> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>>> >>> + case CPU_DEAD:
>>> >>> + topology_remove_dev(sys_dev);
>>> >>> + break;
>>> >>> +#endif
>>> >>
>>> >>Why ifdef? Isn't it safe to just always have this in?
>>> If no ifdef here, gcc reported a compiling warning when I compiled it
>>> on IA64 with CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n.
>>
>>Then you should probably go change it so that CPU_DEAD is defined on
>>non-smp builds, otherwise the code gets quite messy like the above :)

Sorry. My previous explanation is confusing. It's a link warning on ia64. On ia64, the kernel vmlinux doesn't include section .exit.text, so ld will report a link warning when a function is in section .exit.text and another function (not in .exit.text) calls the first one. When CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n, function topology_remove_dev is in section .exit.text, but its caller topology_remove_dev is not in .exit.text.

i386 and x86_64 kernel vmlinux does include .exit.text and discard it only when running, so there is no such warning on i386/x86_64.

There is no other better approach to get rid of the warning unless we change arch/ia64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S to keep all .exit.text in kernel image.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-26 08:42    [W:0.466 / U:1.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site