[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 0/9] mutex subsystem, -V4

On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > hm. 16 CPUs hitting the same semaphore at great arrival rates. The cost
> > of a short spin is much less than the cost of a sleep/wakeup. The machine
> > was doing 100,000 - 200,000 context switches per second.
> interesting.. this might be a good indication that a "spin a bit first"
> mutex slowpath for some locks might be worth implementing...

No, please don't.

Almost always it's a huge sign that the locking is totally broken.

And yes, the fix was to _fix_ the ext3 locking. Not to make semaphores
spin. The ext3 locking was using a semaphore for totally the wrong
reasons, it made zero sense at all.

I think it's fixed now.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.090 / U:1.856 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site