[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 0/9] mutex subsystem, -V4
Arjan van de Ven <> wrote:
> > hm. 16 CPUs hitting the same semaphore at great arrival rates. The cost
> > of a short spin is much less than the cost of a sleep/wakeup. The machine
> > was doing 100,000 - 200,000 context switches per second.
> interesting.. this might be a good indication that a "spin a bit first"
> mutex slowpath for some locks might be worth implementing...

If we see a workload which is triggering such high context switch rates,
maybe. But I don't think we've seen any such for a long time.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-26 12:18    [W:0.118 / U:5.916 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site