[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: do we still need the jiffies wraparound functions ?
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, jeff shia wrote:

> Under the kernel 2.6.x,the jiffies is defined as u64.We cannot count
> on it to overflow.

Actually, no. jiffies is still defined as unsigned long, which reduces
overhead where 64 bit jiffies are not needed. Only jiffies_64 is an u64.

> Do we still need the functions to solve this problem?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-27 05:05    [W:0.033 / U:8.960 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site