[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Question] LinuxThreads, setuid - Is there user mode hook?
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 03:36:37PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
>>On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 15:21 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>>On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:08:58PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
>>>>Why on earth would you use LinuxThreads rather than NPTL? LinuxThreads
>>>>is obsolete and was never remotely POSIX compliant.
>>>You have the strangest ideas of obsolete. NPTL has only been usable
>>>for two years. Software lifecycles can be a lot longer than that.
>>I'm not telling you to stop supporting legacy apps, I'm just saying it's
>>insane to start a project now and target LinuxThreads rather than NPTL
>>which is what it sounded like the OP was doing.
> Applications have to run on existing platforms and work with existing
> software, as I'm sure you know. If someone anywhere in the food chain
> isn't ready for NPTL, a project can easily be stuck with LT for another
> few years.

Thank you for your comments!

Unfortunately I cannot force the users to move into NPTL...
So I thought I will create some kind of a workaround...

So back to my original question... Can I be notified if the
main setuid?

My other solution is to poll the pid of the main program for
this event.

Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-24 17:20    [W:0.033 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site