Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:56:07 +0900 (JST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] fix posix lock on NFS, #2 | From | ASANO Masahiro <> |
| |
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix posix lock on NFS, #2 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:02:31 +0100
> On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 23:38 +0900, ASANO Masahiro wrote: > > Here is a patch. It changes nfsd to keep the range of file_lock for > > later use. Any comments and feedback are welcome.
> NACK. You cannot copy locks like this. See locks_copy_lock().
Thank you for pointing it out. I forgot all that point. I'm trying to update my patch, but things are complicated. Do you think it is safe to copy the file_lock table simply with locks_copy_lock() at that point, or it may break nlm_blocked list in nfsd?
-- masano - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |