[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 0/8] mutex subsystem, ANNOUNCE

* Nick Piggin <> wrote:

> At the very least, the head waiter should not put itself on the end of
> the FIFO when it finds the lock contended and waits again.

It's on my list. I had this implemented a couple of days ago, but then
profiled it and it turns out that the scenario isnt actually happening
in any significant way, not even on the most extreme 512-task workloads.
So i just removed the extra bloat. But i'll look at this again today,
together with some 'max delay' statistics.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-22 09:27    [W:0.063 / U:2.852 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site