lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 0/8] mutex subsystem, ANNOUNCE

* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> At the very least, the head waiter should not put itself on the end of
> the FIFO when it finds the lock contended and waits again.

It's on my list. I had this implemented a couple of days ago, but then
profiled it and it turns out that the scenario isnt actually happening
in any significant way, not even on the most extreme 512-task workloads.
So i just removed the extra bloat. But i'll look at this again today,
together with some 'max delay' statistics.

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-22 09:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans