[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 0/8] mutex subsystem, ANNOUNCE

    > I'd probably just call "bastard": it is probably _unlucky_ when _doesn't_
    > get to retake the lock, judging by the factor-of-4 speedup that Jes
    > demonstrated.

    I suspect that's more avoiding the double wakeup that semaphores have
    (semaphores aren't quite fair either)

    > Which might be the right thing to do, but having the front waiter go to
    > the back of the queue I think is not.

    afaik that isn't happening though.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-22 09:23    [W:0.018 / U:185.668 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site