[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 0/8] mutex subsystem, ANNOUNCE

> I'd probably just call "bastard": it is probably _unlucky_ when _doesn't_
> get to retake the lock, judging by the factor-of-4 speedup that Jes
> demonstrated.

I suspect that's more avoiding the double wakeup that semaphores have
(semaphores aren't quite fair either)

> Which might be the right thing to do, but having the front waiter go to
> the back of the queue I think is not.

afaik that isn't happening though.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-22 09:23    [W:0.058 / U:3.620 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site