Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:00:23 -0500 (EST) | Subject | Re: [patch 0/9] mutex subsystem, -V4 | From | "Sean" <> |
| |
On Thu, December 22, 2005 6:53 pm, Randy.Dunlap said:
> Andrew can surely answer that, but it could be something as > simple as wanting to build a more stable kernel (one without > so much churn), so that things have time to mature and > improve without breaking so many other things... > > This (current) is a hectic development cycle style.
Sure, its probably that simple. Just seems like the techincal arguments clearly support adding a mutex.
Sean
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |