lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla
Adrian Bunk wrote:

>>non-bugzilla post-2.6.14 bugs which I've squirelled away include:
>>
>>
>>From: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org>
>>Subject: Linux 2.6.14: Badness in as-iosched
>>
>>
>
>As the subject says, this is not a post-2.6.14 regression.
>
>Besides this, Jens (Cc'ed) sent a patch for it:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/20/119
>
>Was there a reason why it wasn't applied?
>
>
Jens also posted a different patch on
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/111 addressing my issue. It was supposed
to go in -stable. But, from I see in changelogs, nothing went into
-stable while something similar has been merged into rc3:
http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blobdiff;h=43fa2049568883d6b5c07cc304b77c93d3091abf;hp=fbe050124ec514431c19091d395fa9065b2398a4;hb=8ad9ebb391e4cd75837ee608b9c33fcaceda0bc2;f=block/as-iosched.c

Anyway, I did not reproduce my problem with the first patch that Jens
sent (applied on top of 2.6.14). 2.6.15-rcX look fine too, but I am not
sure I have stressed those kernels as much as 2.6.14.

Brice

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-22 18:37    [W:0.158 / U:4.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site