Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:24:46 +0300 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/02] RT: plist namespace cleanup |
| |
Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 17:10 +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > > > Make the plist namespace consistent. > > > > I think plist_head is much better than pl_head. > > > > However I think plist_empty/plist_unhashed is more accurate > > than plist_head_empty/plist_node_empty, but I am rather > > agnostic to naming. > > unhashed seems very meaningless . We're not hashing anything.
Still we already have hlist_empty/hlist_unhashed
> > Daniel, it would be great if you can check that kernel/rt.o > > was not changed after rename (as it should be). > > I didn't check, but I made no code changes so it should be any > different.
That is why I asked. It is very easy to make a mistake by accident while doing trivial changes, but it is not easy to notice.
Oleg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |