lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?
    On Wed, 2005-12-21 01:22:12 -0800, David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
    > From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
    > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:11:51 +0100
    >
    > > Could some of you post the result of the following command on your machines :

    VAX KA650 (simulated), 4k pages (hw-size is 512 Bytes, though),
    L1_CACHE_BYTES=32

    # grep "size-" /proc/slabinfo |grep -v DMA|cut -c1-40
    size-131072 0 0 131072
    size-65536 0 0 65536
    size-32768 0 0 32768
    size-16384 0 0 16384
    size-8192 0 0 8192
    size-4096 21 21 4096
    size-2048 39 42 2060
    size-1024 18 21 1036
    size-512 70 70 524
    size-256 5 14 268
    size-192 722 722 204
    size-128 145 168 140
    size-96 382 396 108
    size-32 1040 1092 44
    size-64 338 350 76

    MfG, JBG

    --
    Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 _ O _
    "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
    für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O
    ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-21 11:11    [W:0.033 / U:0.208 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site