lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Light-weight dynamically extended stacks
From
Date
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:40:06 EST, Patrick McLean said:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> >
> > This is not intended to be an automatic scheme. To use it, you must
> > actually insert code into the troublesome codepaths, which will of
> > course serve as a red flag for code review.
> >
>
> It might be an idea to put in a #warn to make it an even bigger red
> flag, and to really make people fix this rather than just ignore it
> since it works with the dynamic stacks.

Stick a 'depends on CONFIG_BROKEN' on it? ;)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-21 07:01    [W:2.801 / U:2.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site