lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    From
    Date

    > So, to sum up, if this path is persued, mutexes will be a bloody
    > disaster on ARM. We'd be far better off sticking to semaphores
    > and ignoring this mutex stuff.

    on x86 the fastpath is the same for both basically.. is there a
    fundamental reason it can't be for ARM?

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-20 20:35    [W:0.019 / U:179.576 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site