lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
From
Date

> So, to sum up, if this path is persued, mutexes will be a bloody
> disaster on ARM. We'd be far better off sticking to semaphores
> and ignoring this mutex stuff.

on x86 the fastpath is the same for both basically.. is there a
fundamental reason it can't be for ARM?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-20 20:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans