Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 07/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, mutex-debug-more.patch | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Date | Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:00:29 -0500 |
| |
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 02:38 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Index: linux/lib/spinlock_debug.c > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/lib/spinlock_debug.c > +++ linux/lib/spinlock_debug.c > @@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ static void spin_bug(spinlock_t *lock, c > if (lock->owner && lock->owner != SPINLOCK_OWNER_INIT) > owner = lock->owner; > printk("BUG: spinlock %s on CPU#%d, %s/%d\n", > - msg, smp_processor_id(), current->comm, > current->pid); > + msg, raw_smp_processor_id(), > + current->comm, current->pid); > printk(" lock: %p, .magic: %08x, .owner: %s/% > d, .owner_cpu: %d\n", > lock, lock->magic, > owner ? owner->comm : "<none>", > @@ -78,8 +79,8 @@ static void __spin_lock_debug(spinlock_t > if (print_once) { > print_once = 0; > printk("BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#%d, %s/%d, > %p\n", > - smp_processor_id(), current->comm, > current->pid, > - lock); > + raw_smp_processor_id(), current->comm, > + current->pid, lock); > dump_stack(); > } > }
The changes here from smp_processor_id to raw_smp_processor_id seem to be more clean up and not part of the mutex patch. Should these be sent separately?
-- Steve
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |