[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/12]: MUTEX: Implement mutexes

On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, David Howells wrote:
> Linux supports a number of those archs. Amongst them are 68000 (TAS), arm (SWP
> I think), i386 (XCHG), and FRV (SWAP). I'm also looking at another that only
> has BSET/BCLR.

Don't bother putting i386 in that list.

Quite frankly, you've done it before, and I think it's intellectually
totally dishonest.

i386 does semaphores with a "lock decl". You CANNOT DO IT FASTER. I dare
you. Why the hell do you try to make it sound as if x86 would need this
new thing, when it absolutely does NOT need it.

Yes, x86 _also_ has an xchg instruction, but hey, that's a total
non-argument. We don't actually use that.

Of the other architectures you list, only ARM is really important. And no,
arm doesn't do swap. It does LL/SC (except they call it "ldrex/strex",
which I assume stands for "load/store with reservation and X just because
X is cool. Yeah, we're cool" (*)).

68k is dead. Nobody cares. So just say it outright: this is totally just a

Ok? Just to inject a little honesty here.


(*) Actually, some arm docs I found implies that "ex" stands for
"exclusive", but that leaves me wondering what the "r" stands for?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.081 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site