[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/13] [RFC] ipath basic headers
Date (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

> Christoph Hellwig <> writes:
> > please always used fixes-size types for user communication. also please
> > avoid ioctls like the rest of the IB codebase.
> Could someone please explain to me how the uverbs abuse of write
> is better that ioctl?

It's actually worse because if they have a 32bit compat issue
then ioctl can be fixed up, but read/write can't.

I wish the people arguing against ioctl all the time would
just stop that because the alternatives are usually worse.

> - 64bit compilers will not pad every structure to 8 bytes. This
> only will happen if you happen to have an 8 byte element in your
> structure that is only aligned to 32bits by a 32bit structure.
> Unfortunately the 32bit gcc only aligns long long to 32bits on
> x86, which triggers the described behavior.

Exactly - and driver writers usually don't get that right so we
need to have a tool to fix it up in the end. And with ioctl
that's easiest.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-18 04:28    [W:0.083 / U:0.840 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site