[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks


    Thanks. I concur.


    Andrew Morton wrote:

    >Adrian Bunk <> wrote:
    >>This patch was already sent on:
    >>- 11 Dec 2005
    >>- 5 Dec 2005
    >>- 30 Nov 2005
    >>- 23 Nov 2005
    >>- 14 Nov 2005
    >Sigh. I saw the volume of email last time and though "gee, glad I wasn't
    >cc'ed on that lot".
    >Supporting 8k stacks is a small amount of code and nobody has seen a need
    >to make changes in there for quite a long time. So there's little cost to
    >keeping the existing code.
    >And the existing code is useful:
    >a) people can enable it to confirm that their weird crash was due to a
    > stack overflow.
    >b) If I was going to put together a maximally-stable kernel for a
    > complex server machine, I'd select 8k stacks. We're still just too
    > squeezy, and we've had too many relatively-recent overflows, and there
    > are still some really deep callpaths in there.
    >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    >the body of a message to
    >More majordomo info at
    >Please read the FAQ at

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-12-15 23:14    [W:0.023 / U:22.788 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site