[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks


Thanks. I concur.


Andrew Morton wrote:

>Adrian Bunk <> wrote:
>>This patch was already sent on:
>>- 11 Dec 2005
>>- 5 Dec 2005
>>- 30 Nov 2005
>>- 23 Nov 2005
>>- 14 Nov 2005
>Sigh. I saw the volume of email last time and though "gee, glad I wasn't
>cc'ed on that lot".
>Supporting 8k stacks is a small amount of code and nobody has seen a need
>to make changes in there for quite a long time. So there's little cost to
>keeping the existing code.
>And the existing code is useful:
>a) people can enable it to confirm that their weird crash was due to a
> stack overflow.
>b) If I was going to put together a maximally-stable kernel for a
> complex server machine, I'd select 8k stacks. We're still just too
> squeezy, and we've had too many relatively-recent overflows, and there
> are still some really deep callpaths in there.
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to
>More majordomo info at
>Please read the FAQ at

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-15 23:14    [W:0.118 / U:7.768 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site