Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation | From | James Bottomley <> | Date | Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:48:48 -0800 |
| |
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:45 -0800, Luck, Tony wrote: > There was a USENIX paper a couple of decades ago that described how > to do a fast s/w disable of interrupts on machines where really disabling > interrupts was expensive. The rough gist was that the spl[1-7]() > functions would just set a flag in memory to hold the desired interrupt > mask. If an interrupt actually occurred when it was s/w blocked, the > handler would set a pending flag, and just rfi with interrupts disabled. > Then the splx() code checked to see whether there was a pending interrupt > and dealt with it if there was.
Would you believe that that paper was written about the NCR Voyager architecture (The VIC is very expensive for interrupt disables) and that the current Linux Voyager Subarchitecture still makes partial use of the scheme.
James
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |