lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 05:16:45PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> So who should I put as the author? You or Geert (or whatever attributions
> might have been in said big patch)? Incidentally, ADBREQ_RAW had leaked
> into mainline (sans definition) in 2.3.45-pre2, which was Feb 13 2000, i.e.
> more than 1.5 year before your commit, so there's quite a chunk of history
> missing...
>
> I'm serious, BTW - I certainly would have no problem preserving attribution,
> but it simply hadn't been there. CVS logs are only as good as the data
> being put there by committers...

With some archaeology... It looks like drivers/macintosh part is from
Geert (with chunks from benh? not sure) circa Dec 2000; adb.h is a missing
piece of earlier patch (one that had leaked in Feb 2000, $DEITY knowns how
much older it is)...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-12-15 18:49    [W:0.592 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site