Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] TCP/IP Critical socket communication mechanism | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:47:28 +0100 |
| |
> > You are using the wrong hammer to crack your nut. > You should instead approach your problem of why the ARP entry gets lost. > For example, you could give as critical priority to your TCP session, > but that still won't cure your ARP problem. > I would suggest that the best way to cure your arp problem, is to > increase the time between arp cache refreshes.
or turn it around entirely: all traffic is considered important unless... and have a bunch of non-critical sockets (like http requests) be marked non-critical.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |